// Copyright 2020-2021 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd. // This file is part of Parity Bridges Common. // Parity Bridges Common is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify // it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by // the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or // (at your option) any later version. // Parity Bridges Common is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, // but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of // MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the // GNU General Public License for more details. // You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License // along with Parity Bridges Common. If not, see . //! Tests inside this module are made to ensure that our custom justification verification //! implementation works exactly as `fn finality_grandpa::validate_commit`. //! //! Some of tests in this module may partially duplicate tests from `justification.rs`, //! but their purpose is different. use assert_matches::assert_matches; use bp_header_chain::justification::{verify_justification, Error, GrandpaJustification}; use bp_test_utils::{ header_id, make_justification_for_header, signed_precommit, test_header, Account, JustificationGeneratorParams, ALICE, BOB, CHARLIE, DAVE, EVE, TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, }; use finality_grandpa::voter_set::VoterSet; use sp_finality_grandpa::{AuthorityId, AuthorityWeight}; use sp_runtime::traits::Header as HeaderT; type TestHeader = sp_runtime::testing::Header; type TestHash = ::Hash; type TestNumber = ::Number; /// Implementation of `finality_grandpa::Chain` that is used in tests. struct AncestryChain(bp_header_chain::justification::AncestryChain); impl AncestryChain { fn new(ancestry: &[TestHeader]) -> Self { Self(bp_header_chain::justification::AncestryChain::new(ancestry)) } } impl finality_grandpa::Chain for AncestryChain { fn ancestry( &self, base: TestHash, block: TestHash, ) -> Result, finality_grandpa::Error> { let mut route = Vec::new(); let mut current_hash = block; loop { if current_hash == base { break } match self.0.parents.get(¤t_hash).cloned() { Some(parent_hash) => { current_hash = parent_hash; route.push(current_hash); }, _ => return Err(finality_grandpa::Error::NotDescendent), } } route.pop(); // remove the base Ok(route) } } /// Get a full set of accounts. fn full_accounts_set() -> Vec<(Account, AuthorityWeight)> { vec![(ALICE, 1), (BOB, 1), (CHARLIE, 1), (DAVE, 1), (EVE, 1)] } /// Get a full set of GRANDPA authorities. fn full_voter_set() -> VoterSet { VoterSet::new(full_accounts_set().iter().map(|(id, w)| (AuthorityId::from(*id), *w))).unwrap() } /// Get a minimal set of accounts. fn minimal_accounts_set() -> Vec<(Account, AuthorityWeight)> { // there are 5 accounts in the full set => we need 2/3 + 1 accounts, which results in 4 accounts vec![(ALICE, 1), (BOB, 1), (CHARLIE, 1), (DAVE, 1)] } /// Get a minimal subset of GRANDPA authorities that have enough cumulative vote weight to justify a /// header finality. pub fn minimal_voter_set() -> VoterSet { VoterSet::new(minimal_accounts_set().iter().map(|(id, w)| (AuthorityId::from(*id), *w))) .unwrap() } /// Make a valid GRANDPA justification with sensible defaults. pub fn make_default_justification(header: &TestHeader) -> GrandpaJustification { make_justification_for_header(JustificationGeneratorParams { header: header.clone(), authorities: minimal_accounts_set(), ..Default::default() }) } // the `finality_grandpa::validate_commit` function has two ways to report an unsuccessful // commit validation: // // 1) to return `Err()` (which only may happen if `finality_grandpa::Chain` implementation // returns an error); // 2) to return `Ok(validation_result) if validation_result.ghost().is_none()`. // // Our implementation would just return error in both cases. #[test] fn same_result_when_precommit_target_has_lower_number_than_commit_target() { let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1)); // the number of header in precommit (0) is lower than number of header in commit (1) justification.commit.precommits[0].precommit.target_number = 0; // our implementation returns an error assert_eq!( verify_justification::( header_id::(1), TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, &full_voter_set(), &justification, ), Err(Error::PrecommitIsNotCommitDescendant), ); // original implementation returns empty GHOST assert_matches!( finality_grandpa::validate_commit( &justification.commit, &full_voter_set(), &AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries), ) .map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()), Ok(None) ); } #[test] fn same_result_when_precommit_target_is_not_descendant_of_commit_target() { let not_descendant = test_header::(10); let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1)); // the route from header of commit (1) to header of precommit (10) is missing from // the votes ancestries justification.commit.precommits[0].precommit.target_number = *not_descendant.number(); justification.commit.precommits[0].precommit.target_hash = not_descendant.hash(); justification.votes_ancestries.push(not_descendant); // our implementation returns an error assert_eq!( verify_justification::( header_id::(1), TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, &full_voter_set(), &justification, ), Err(Error::PrecommitIsNotCommitDescendant), ); // original implementation returns empty GHOST assert_matches!( finality_grandpa::validate_commit( &justification.commit, &full_voter_set(), &AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries), ) .map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()), Ok(None) ); } #[test] fn same_result_when_justification_contains_duplicate_vote() { let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1)); // the justification may contain exactly the same vote (i.e. same precommit and same signature) // multiple times && it isn't treated as an error by original implementation justification.commit.precommits.push(justification.commit.precommits[0].clone()); justification.commit.precommits.push(justification.commit.precommits[0].clone()); // our implementation succeeds assert_eq!( verify_justification::( header_id::(1), TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, &full_voter_set(), &justification, ), Ok(()), ); // original implementation returns non-empty GHOST assert_matches!( finality_grandpa::validate_commit( &justification.commit, &full_voter_set(), &AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries), ) .map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()), Ok(Some(_)) ); } #[test] fn same_result_when_authority_equivocates_once_in_a_round() { let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1)); // the justification original implementation allows authority to submit two different // votes in a single round, of which only first is 'accepted' justification.commit.precommits.push(signed_precommit::( &ALICE, header_id::(1), justification.round, TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, )); // our implementation succeeds assert_eq!( verify_justification::( header_id::(1), TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, &full_voter_set(), &justification, ), Ok(()), ); // original implementation returns non-empty GHOST assert_matches!( finality_grandpa::validate_commit( &justification.commit, &full_voter_set(), &AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries), ) .map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()), Ok(Some(_)) ); } #[test] fn same_result_when_authority_equivocates_twice_in_a_round() { let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1)); // there's some code in the original implementation that should return an error when // same authority submits more than two different votes in a single round: // https://github.com/paritytech/finality-grandpa/blob/6aeea2d1159d0f418f0b86e70739f2130629ca09/src/lib.rs#L473 // but there's also a code that prevents this from happening: // https://github.com/paritytech/finality-grandpa/blob/6aeea2d1159d0f418f0b86e70739f2130629ca09/src/round.rs#L287 // => so now we are also just ignoring all votes from the same authority, except the first one justification.commit.precommits.push(signed_precommit::( &ALICE, header_id::(1), justification.round, TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, )); justification.commit.precommits.push(signed_precommit::( &ALICE, header_id::(1), justification.round, TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, )); // our implementation succeeds assert_eq!( verify_justification::( header_id::(1), TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, &full_voter_set(), &justification, ), Ok(()), ); // original implementation returns non-empty GHOST assert_matches!( finality_grandpa::validate_commit( &justification.commit, &full_voter_set(), &AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries), ) .map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()), Ok(Some(_)) ); } #[test] fn same_result_when_there_are_not_enough_cumulative_weight_to_finalize_commit_target() { // just remove one authority from the minimal set and we shall not reach the threshold let mut authorities_set = minimal_accounts_set(); authorities_set.pop(); let justification = make_justification_for_header(JustificationGeneratorParams { header: test_header(1), authorities: authorities_set, ..Default::default() }); // our implementation returns an error assert_eq!( verify_justification::( header_id::(1), TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID, &full_voter_set(), &justification, ), Err(Error::TooLowCumulativeWeight), ); // original implementation returns empty GHOST assert_matches!( finality_grandpa::validate_commit( &justification.commit, &full_voter_set(), &AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries), ) .map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()), Ok(None) ); }