Newer
Older
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
// Copyright 2020-2021 Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
// This file is part of Parity Bridges Common.
// Parity Bridges Common is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
// Parity Bridges Common is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
// GNU General Public License for more details.
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
// along with Parity Bridges Common. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
//! Tests inside this module are made to ensure that our custom justification verification
//! implementation works exactly as `fn finality_grandpa::validate_commit`.
//!
//! Some of tests in this module may partially duplicate tests from `justification.rs`,
//! but their purpose is different.
use assert_matches::assert_matches;
use bp_header_chain::justification::{verify_justification, Error, GrandpaJustification};
use bp_test_utils::{
header_id, make_justification_for_header, signed_precommit, test_header, Account, JustificationGeneratorParams,
ALICE, BOB, CHARLIE, DAVE, EVE, TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
};
use finality_grandpa::voter_set::VoterSet;
use sp_finality_grandpa::{AuthorityId, AuthorityWeight};
use sp_runtime::traits::Header as HeaderT;
type TestHeader = sp_runtime::testing::Header;
type TestHash = <TestHeader as HeaderT>::Hash;
type TestNumber = <TestHeader as HeaderT>::Number;
/// Implementation of `finality_grandpa::Chain` that is used in tests.
struct AncestryChain(bp_header_chain::justification::AncestryChain<TestHeader>);
impl AncestryChain {
fn new(ancestry: &[TestHeader]) -> Self {
Self(bp_header_chain::justification::AncestryChain::new(ancestry))
}
}
impl finality_grandpa::Chain<TestHash, TestNumber> for AncestryChain {
fn ancestry(&self, base: TestHash, block: TestHash) -> Result<Vec<TestHash>, finality_grandpa::Error> {
let mut route = Vec::new();
let mut current_hash = block;
loop {
if current_hash == base {
break;
}
match self.0.parents.get(¤t_hash).cloned() {
Some(parent_hash) => {
current_hash = parent_hash;
route.push(current_hash);
}
_ => return Err(finality_grandpa::Error::NotDescendent),
}
}
route.pop(); // remove the base
Ok(route)
}
}
/// Get a full set of accounts.
fn full_accounts_set() -> Vec<(Account, AuthorityWeight)> {
vec![(ALICE, 1), (BOB, 1), (CHARLIE, 1), (DAVE, 1), (EVE, 1)]
}
/// Get a full set of GRANDPA authorities.
fn full_voter_set() -> VoterSet<AuthorityId> {
VoterSet::new(full_accounts_set().iter().map(|(id, w)| (AuthorityId::from(*id), *w))).unwrap()
}
/// Get a minimal set of accounts.
fn minimal_accounts_set() -> Vec<(Account, AuthorityWeight)> {
// there are 5 accounts in the full set => we need 2/3 + 1 accounts, which results in 4 accounts
vec![(ALICE, 1), (BOB, 1), (CHARLIE, 1), (DAVE, 1)]
}
/// Get a minimal subset of GRANDPA authorities that have enough cumulative vote weight to justify a header finality.
pub fn minimal_voter_set() -> VoterSet<AuthorityId> {
VoterSet::new(
minimal_accounts_set()
.iter()
.map(|(id, w)| (AuthorityId::from(*id), *w)),
)
.unwrap()
}
/// Make a valid GRANDPA justification with sensible defaults.
pub fn make_default_justification(header: &TestHeader) -> GrandpaJustification<TestHeader> {
make_justification_for_header(JustificationGeneratorParams {
header: header.clone(),
authorities: minimal_accounts_set(),
..Default::default()
})
}
// the `finality_grandpa::validate_commit` function has two ways to report an unsuccessful
// commit validation:
//
// 1) to return `Err()` (which only may happen if `finality_grandpa::Chain` implementation
// returns an error);
// 2) to return `Ok(validation_result) if validation_result.ghost().is_none()`.
//
// Our implementation would just return error in both cases.
#[test]
fn same_result_when_precommit_target_has_lower_number_than_commit_target() {
let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1));
// the number of header in precommit (0) is lower than number of header in commit (1)
justification.commit.precommits[0].precommit.target_number = 0;
// our implementation returns an error
assert_eq!(
verify_justification::<TestHeader>(
header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
&full_voter_set(),
&justification,
),
Err(Error::PrecommitIsNotCommitDescendant),
);
// original implementation returns empty GHOST
assert_matches!(
finality_grandpa::validate_commit(
&justification.commit,
&full_voter_set(),
&AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries),
)
.map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()),
Ok(None)
);
}
#[test]
fn same_result_when_precommit_target_is_not_descendant_of_commit_target() {
let not_descendant = test_header::<TestHeader>(10);
let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1));
// the route from header of commit (1) to header of precommit (10) is missing from
// the votes ancestries
justification.commit.precommits[0].precommit.target_number = *not_descendant.number();
justification.commit.precommits[0].precommit.target_hash = not_descendant.hash();
justification.votes_ancestries.push(not_descendant);
// our implementation returns an error
assert_eq!(
verify_justification::<TestHeader>(
header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
&full_voter_set(),
&justification,
),
Err(Error::PrecommitIsNotCommitDescendant),
);
// original implementation returns empty GHOST
assert_matches!(
finality_grandpa::validate_commit(
&justification.commit,
&full_voter_set(),
&AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries),
)
.map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()),
Ok(None)
);
}
#[test]
fn same_result_when_justification_contains_duplicate_vote() {
let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1));
// the justification may contain exactly the same vote (i.e. same precommit and same signature)
// multiple times && it isn't treated as an error by original implementation
justification
.commit
.precommits
.push(justification.commit.precommits[0].clone());
justification
.commit
.precommits
.push(justification.commit.precommits[0].clone());
// our implementation succeeds
assert_eq!(
verify_justification::<TestHeader>(
header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
&full_voter_set(),
&justification,
),
Ok(()),
);
// original implementation returns non-empty GHOST
assert_matches!(
finality_grandpa::validate_commit(
&justification.commit,
&full_voter_set(),
&AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries),
)
.map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()),
Ok(Some(_))
);
}
#[test]
fn same_result_when_authority_equivocates_once_in_a_round() {
let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1));
// the justification original implementation allows authority to submit two different
// votes in a single round, of which only first is 'accepted'
justification.commit.precommits.push(signed_precommit::<TestHeader>(
&ALICE,
header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
justification.round,
TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
));
// our implementation succeeds
assert_eq!(
verify_justification::<TestHeader>(
header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
&full_voter_set(),
&justification,
),
Ok(()),
);
// original implementation returns non-empty GHOST
assert_matches!(
finality_grandpa::validate_commit(
&justification.commit,
&full_voter_set(),
&AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries),
)
.map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()),
Ok(Some(_))
);
}
#[test]
fn same_result_when_authority_equivocates_twice_in_a_round() {
let mut justification = make_default_justification(&test_header(1));
// there's some code in the original implementation that should return an error when
// same authority submits more than two different votes in a single round:
// https://github.com/paritytech/finality-grandpa/blob/6aeea2d1159d0f418f0b86e70739f2130629ca09/src/lib.rs#L473
// but there's also a code that prevents this from happening:
// https://github.com/paritytech/finality-grandpa/blob/6aeea2d1159d0f418f0b86e70739f2130629ca09/src/round.rs#L287
// => so now we are also just ignoring all votes from the same authority, except the first one
justification.commit.precommits.push(signed_precommit::<TestHeader>(
&ALICE,
header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
justification.round,
TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
));
justification.commit.precommits.push(signed_precommit::<TestHeader>(
&ALICE,
header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
justification.round,
TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
));
// our implementation succeeds
assert_eq!(
verify_justification::<TestHeader>(
header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
&full_voter_set(),
&justification,
),
Ok(()),
);
// original implementation returns non-empty GHOST
assert_matches!(
finality_grandpa::validate_commit(
&justification.commit,
&full_voter_set(),
&AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries),
)
.map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()),
Ok(Some(_))
);
}
#[test]
fn same_result_when_there_are_not_enough_cumulative_weight_to_finalize_commit_target() {
// just remove one authority from the minimal set and we shall not reach the threshold
let mut authorities_set = minimal_accounts_set();
authorities_set.pop();
let justification = make_justification_for_header(JustificationGeneratorParams {
header: test_header(1),
authorities: authorities_set,
..Default::default()
});
// our implementation returns an error
assert_eq!(
verify_justification::<TestHeader>(
header_id::<TestHeader>(1),
TEST_GRANDPA_SET_ID,
&full_voter_set(),
&justification,
),
Err(Error::TooLowCumulativeWeight),
);
// original implementation returns empty GHOST
assert_matches!(
finality_grandpa::validate_commit(
&justification.commit,
&full_voter_set(),
&AncestryChain::new(&justification.votes_ancestries),
)
.map(|result| result.ghost().cloned()),
Ok(None)
);
}