Newer
Older
// Copyright (C) Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd.
// This file is part of Parity Bridges Common.
// Parity Bridges Common is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
// Parity Bridges Common is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
// GNU General Public License for more details.
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
// along with Parity Bridges Common. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
//! Logic for checking GRANDPA Finality Proofs.
pub mod equivocation;
pub mod optimizer;
pub mod strict;
use crate::{justification::GrandpaJustification, AuthoritySet};
use bp_runtime::HeaderId;
use finality_grandpa::voter_set::VoterSet;
use sp_consensus_grandpa::{AuthorityId, AuthoritySignature, SetId};
use sp_runtime::{traits::Header as HeaderT, RuntimeDebug};
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
use sp_std::{
collections::{btree_map::BTreeMap, btree_set::BTreeSet},
prelude::*,
};
type SignedPrecommit<Header> = finality_grandpa::SignedPrecommit<
<Header as HeaderT>::Hash,
<Header as HeaderT>::Number,
AuthoritySignature,
AuthorityId,
>;
/// Votes ancestries with useful methods.
#[derive(RuntimeDebug)]
pub struct AncestryChain<Header: HeaderT> {
/// We expect all forks in the ancestry chain to be descendants of base.
base: HeaderId<Header::Hash, Header::Number>,
/// Header hash => parent header hash mapping.
pub parents: BTreeMap<Header::Hash, Header::Hash>,
/// Hashes of headers that were not visited by `ancestry()`.
pub unvisited: BTreeSet<Header::Hash>,
}
impl<Header: HeaderT> AncestryChain<Header> {
/// Create new ancestry chain.
pub fn new(justification: &GrandpaJustification<Header>) -> AncestryChain<Header> {
let mut parents = BTreeMap::new();
let mut unvisited = BTreeSet::new();
for ancestor in &justification.votes_ancestries {
let hash = ancestor.hash();
let parent_hash = *ancestor.parent_hash();
parents.insert(hash, parent_hash);
unvisited.insert(hash);
}
AncestryChain { base: justification.commit_target_id(), parents, unvisited }
}
/// Returns a route if the precommit target block is a descendant of the `base` block.
pub fn ancestry(
&self,
precommit_target_hash: &Header::Hash,
precommit_target_number: &Header::Number,
) -> Option<Vec<Header::Hash>> {
if precommit_target_number < &self.base.number() {
return None
}
let mut route = vec![];
let mut current_hash = *precommit_target_hash;
loop {
if current_hash == self.base.hash() {
break
}
current_hash = match self.parents.get(¤t_hash) {
Some(parent_hash) => {
let is_visited_before = self.unvisited.get(¤t_hash).is_none();
if is_visited_before {
// If the current header has been visited in a previous call, it is a
// descendent of `base` (we assume that the previous call was successful).
return Some(route)
}
route.push(current_hash);
*parent_hash
},
None => return None,
};
}
Some(route)
}
fn mark_route_as_visited(&mut self, route: Vec<Header::Hash>) {
for hash in route {
self.unvisited.remove(&hash);
}
}
fn is_fully_visited(&self) -> bool {
self.unvisited.is_empty()
}
}
/// Justification verification error.
#[derive(Eq, RuntimeDebug, PartialEq)]
pub enum Error {
/// Could not convert `AuthorityList` to `VoterSet`.
InvalidAuthorityList,
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
/// Justification is finalizing unexpected header.
InvalidJustificationTarget,
/// Error validating a precommit
Precommit(PrecommitError),
/// The cumulative weight of all votes in the justification is not enough to justify commit
/// header finalization.
TooLowCumulativeWeight,
/// The justification contains extra (unused) headers in its `votes_ancestries` field.
RedundantVotesAncestries,
}
/// Justification verification error.
#[derive(Eq, RuntimeDebug, PartialEq)]
pub enum PrecommitError {
/// Justification contains redundant votes.
RedundantAuthorityVote,
/// Justification contains unknown authority precommit.
UnknownAuthorityVote,
/// Justification contains duplicate authority precommit.
DuplicateAuthorityVote,
/// The authority has provided an invalid signature.
InvalidAuthoritySignature,
/// The justification contains precommit for header that is not a descendant of the commit
/// header.
UnrelatedAncestryVote,
}
/// The context needed for validating GRANDPA finality proofs.
pub struct JustificationVerificationContext {
/// The authority set used to verify the justification.
pub voter_set: VoterSet<AuthorityId>,
/// The ID of the authority set used to verify the justification.
pub authority_set_id: SetId,
}
impl TryFrom<AuthoritySet> for JustificationVerificationContext {
type Error = Error;
fn try_from(authority_set: AuthoritySet) -> Result<Self, Self::Error> {
let voter_set =
VoterSet::new(authority_set.authorities).ok_or(Error::InvalidAuthorityList)?;
Ok(JustificationVerificationContext { voter_set, authority_set_id: authority_set.set_id })
}
}
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
enum IterationFlow {
Run,
Skip,
}
/// Verification callbacks.
trait JustificationVerifier<Header: HeaderT> {
fn process_redundant_vote(
&mut self,
precommit_idx: usize,
) -> Result<IterationFlow, PrecommitError>;
fn process_known_authority_vote(
&mut self,
precommit_idx: usize,
signed: &SignedPrecommit<Header>,
) -> Result<IterationFlow, PrecommitError>;
fn process_unknown_authority_vote(
&mut self,
precommit_idx: usize,
) -> Result<(), PrecommitError>;
fn process_unrelated_ancestry_vote(
&mut self,
precommit_idx: usize,
) -> Result<IterationFlow, PrecommitError>;
fn process_invalid_signature_vote(
&mut self,
precommit_idx: usize,
) -> Result<(), PrecommitError>;
fn process_valid_vote(&mut self, signed: &SignedPrecommit<Header>);
/// Called when there are redundant headers in the votes ancestries.
fn process_redundant_votes_ancestries(
&mut self,
redundant_votes_ancestries: BTreeSet<Header::Hash>,
) -> Result<(), Error>;
fn verify_justification(
&mut self,
finalized_target: (Header::Hash, Header::Number),
context: &JustificationVerificationContext,
justification: &GrandpaJustification<Header>,
) -> Result<(), Error> {
// ensure that it is justification for the expected header
if (justification.commit.target_hash, justification.commit.target_number) !=
finalized_target
{
return Err(Error::InvalidJustificationTarget)
}
let threshold = context.voter_set.threshold().get();
let mut chain = AncestryChain::new(justification);
let mut signature_buffer = Vec::new();
let mut cumulative_weight = 0u64;
for (precommit_idx, signed) in justification.commit.precommits.iter().enumerate() {
if cumulative_weight >= threshold {
let action =
self.process_redundant_vote(precommit_idx).map_err(Error::Precommit)?;
if matches!(action, IterationFlow::Skip) {
continue
}
}
// authority must be in the set
let authority_info = match context.voter_set.get(&signed.id) {
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
Some(authority_info) => {
// The implementer may want to do extra checks here.
// For example to see if the authority has already voted in the same round.
let action = self
.process_known_authority_vote(precommit_idx, signed)
.map_err(Error::Precommit)?;
if matches!(action, IterationFlow::Skip) {
continue
}
authority_info
},
None => {
self.process_unknown_authority_vote(precommit_idx).map_err(Error::Precommit)?;
continue
},
};
// all precommits must be descendants of the target block
let maybe_route =
chain.ancestry(&signed.precommit.target_hash, &signed.precommit.target_number);
if maybe_route.is_none() {
let action = self
.process_unrelated_ancestry_vote(precommit_idx)
.map_err(Error::Precommit)?;
if matches!(action, IterationFlow::Skip) {
continue
}
}
// verify authority signature
if !sp_consensus_grandpa::check_message_signature_with_buffer(
&finality_grandpa::Message::Precommit(signed.precommit.clone()),
&signed.id,
&signed.signature,
justification.round,
context.authority_set_id,
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
&mut signature_buffer,
) {
self.process_invalid_signature_vote(precommit_idx).map_err(Error::Precommit)?;
continue
}
// now we can count the vote since we know that it is valid
self.process_valid_vote(signed);
if let Some(route) = maybe_route {
chain.mark_route_as_visited(route);
cumulative_weight = cumulative_weight.saturating_add(authority_info.weight().get());
}
}
// check that the cumulative weight of validators that voted for the justification target
// (or one of its descendents) is larger than the required threshold.
if cumulative_weight < threshold {
return Err(Error::TooLowCumulativeWeight)
}
// check that there are no extra headers in the justification
if !chain.is_fully_visited() {
self.process_redundant_votes_ancestries(chain.unvisited)?;
}
Ok(())
}
}